Criticism of power does not stand in the way of forward thinking
Debate Posts

Ki-generated illustration from Midjourney
Main moments
We must be power critical in our handling of artificial intelligence, argues jurist Embla Nerland in Aftenposten. She puts it up against my suggestions of a Minister of Technology in charge of KI and more future-thinking.
Politicians must no doubt understand the power structures and respond with measures that equalise them. But a power-critical KI policy requires political institutions that are flexible enough to meet rapid change, such as an KI minister.
We're already in arrears. We need to interpret and adapt the legislation to deal with KI, introduce an algorithm oversight to prevent discriminatory use of KI, fund and develop safe AI solutions, i.e. systems that can be understood and more easily monitored, and an KI minister who takes an active role in international collaborations on KI to learn from international expertise and contribute to global frameworks.
Politicians need to know their contemporaries. But without a long-term perspective, the policy will be outdated in the time it takes effect. We therefore need both critical power analysis and forward thinking!
More from Langsikt

A sea of data
Norway is in the process of building a digital twin of the ocean, but we use it primarily for reporting, not for innovation.

School should teach kids how to navigate the future
We will not be able to live without a mobile phone, nor will we do without artificial intelligence. Yet school protects children from the tools they must learn to master.

The Ten AI Commandments Link Principles to Politics
The committee's report proposes 44 concrete measures for Norway to build competence, capacity and supervision in the KIC economy.

The machine can find shortcuts in the tank
A machine has improved one of computer science's most fundamental ideas -- Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm. It marks a turning point, where the boundary between human insight and machine computation is blurring.