Transport demand in futures with artificial general intelligence
We discuss the potential impact of artificial general intelligence (AGI) on society, labor markets and transport demand, and argue that transport planners need to rethink long-term future scenarios.
Ki-generated illustration from Midjourney
Main moments
In this paper Stefan Flügel and Paal B. Wangsness from the Institute of Transport Economics discuss how artificial general intelligence (AGI) can affect society, labour market and transport needs, with particular focus on Norway. The authors argue that current transport planning must more broadly take into account technological breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI). AGI, which denotes systems that can perform a wide range of tasks on par with or better than humans, is expected to have major implications for both economic growth and social welfare.
The authors present 32 future scenarios. These vary with respect to global economic growth, international level of conflict, whether KI replaces or complements labour, the degree of regulation and the degree of redistribution. The results show that Norwegians' welfare can increase significantly in some scenarios, but also fall dramatically in others — especially if AGI leads to mass unemployment without sufficient redistribution.
Furthermore, transportation demand is modeled in 12 scenarios based on three drivers: welfare, labor participation, and leisure preferences. The effect of autonomous vehicles is also introduced as an uncertain but central factor.
The authors conclude that although there is great uncertainty related to the development of artificial intelligence and its impacts, transport planners should start analyzing such scenarios already now. They recommend establishing indicators to follow technological developments and designing flexible policy measures that promote the socially beneficial use of AI in the transport sector and limit negative effects such as queuing and pollution.
More from Langsikt
Bruk gjerne KI til å skrive tekst, men det er kritisk viktig at det finnes en avsender
I offentligheten er det likegyldig om man får skrivehjelp av en venn, enten vennen er av silisium eller kjøtt og blod.
Data discovery — a tax incentive for sharing data
Norway can't speed up KI without better data, and no one has incentives to make data shareable. That's why we need a tax incentive for data quality and sharing.
AI risk is many things — that's why we need multiple conversations at the same time
KI risk is not one thing. When we mix together concrete, political and long-term dangers, debate and policy become demanding.
A golden year for AI
2026 will be a golden moment for artificial intelligence. We should enjoy it while it lasts.