Input to Development Minister in Light of Global Aid Cuts
Global aid cuts must have consequences for Norwegian priorities.
Ki-generated illustration from Sora.
Main moments
Global aid cuts must have consequences for Norwegian priorities. There is no contradiction between being generous and prioritizing hard, or putting the consideration of those in greatest need ahead of others. Norway should show the world that it is possible to continue a high level of aid simultaneously which places higher demands on cost-effectiveness and proven results. After major cuts in aid globally, it is time to make proper reprioritisations in Norwegian aid.
This summer we published a 100-day plan for new government on development policy: Better aid for a changed world, with 20 specific recommendations that we hope you and the officials in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have considered. The recommendations build on four Long Term Notes published in the spring of 2025.
Anyway, for the situation you're in now, here are nine customized and prioritized recommendations for you.
Download to read the full statement (only in Norwegian).
More from Langsikt
Support for civil society is not intended for Norwegian organizations
Norad's proposal to open up for more competition between Norwegian and foreign actors regarding civil society support has ignited the aid debate. Many fear for the future of Norwegian organizations. But it is not primarily their future that this support is intended to secure.
Statement: Norway should strengthen its global health leadership
The statement is an input to the Turning Point process, offering recommendations on how Norway can strengthen its international leadership in global health at a time of increasing global needs and weakened international cooperation.
Submission on Norwegian positions at the World Health Assembly
Four key points to address during WHA79.
Better assistance
If the government wants to fight poverty, why not give the money directly to the poor?